If you're like me, always looking for the cleanest DX, tight control over content modeling, and a CMS that won’t make you pull your hair out, then this blog’s for you. I’ve worked with most of these CMSes across various freelance gigs and side projects, and each one comes with its own flavor, quirks, and superpowers.
Here’s a breakdown of seven solid headless CMS platforms, Strapi, Sanity, KeystoneJS, Payload CMS, DatoCMS, Ghost, and TinaCMS, with a lens on performance, developer experience, and where they shine best. I’ve kept it as real as possible, with numbers, code, and honest opinions.
1. Strapi
Strapi is a full-featured open-source CMS built on Node.js. It lets you define content types using a nice UI or extend them in code. You get REST and GraphQL APIs out of the box, decent role-based access control, and a plugin system for auth, uploads, and more. It stores data in SQL (SQLite, Postgres, MySQL), making it pretty flexible.
What I Like:
Clean admin panel
Easily extendable with plugins
Good RBAC out of the box
Numbers:
Avg. REST API response: 70ms
Cold start on serverless: ~350ms
Use Case: Perfect for mid-sized projects that need an admin UI and customizable APIs.
2. Sanity
Sanity is a real-time, collaborative CMS that takes a structured approach to content. You define your content schema in JavaScript/TypeScript and use GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries) to fetch exactly what you want. Sanity Studio is a full React app you can customize or extend, and real-time syncing is baked in.
What I Like:
Real-time collab is 🔥
Portable text format is versatile
Sanity Studio is React-based and super extensible
Numbers:
GROQ query (nested doc): ~60ms
Real-time sync: <100ms
Use Case: Structured content-heavy projects, especially when your frontend is React/Next.js.
3. KeystoneJS
KeystoneJS is a modern backend and CMS framework powered by Node.js and Prisma. You define your schema in code, and it generates a GraphQL API, admin UI, and hooks. Its field-level access control and custom input types make it super extensible.
What I Like:
Built-in GraphQL API
Prisma for DB handling
Hooks and access control baked in
Numbers:
GraphQL query (with relations): \~80ms
Build time (50 models): \~10s
Use Case: Projects where you want CMS + backend custom logic in one place.
4. Payload CMS
Payload is a TypeScript-first, self-hosted CMS that gives you complete control via config files. It’s code-first, with no auto-generated stuff you can’t override. It supports custom authentication, access control, media handling, and integrates smoothly into full-stack apps.
What I Like:
Full TypeScript support
Custom auth, media handling
Local file uploads just work
Numbers:
Protected REST route: \~75ms
Docker cold start: 8s
Use Case: Ideal if you're building a full product with custom APIs, auth, media, and don’t want a black box CMS.
5. DatoCMS
DatoCMS is a SaaS CMS that offers a GraphQL API, optimized media handling, and built-in CDN delivery. It’s ideal for large content teams thanks to modular content modeling, granular roles/permissions, and automated webhooks for static site generation workflows.
What I Like:
GraphQL API is blazing fast
Modular content modeling is intuitive
Built-in CDN + media support
Numbers:
10k entries (Next.js build): \~35s
GraphQL API latency: 40-60ms
Use Case: Content-heavy Jamstack sites at scale.
6. Ghost
Ghost is a Node.js-powered CMS built for publishers, bloggers, and indie writers. It's focused on speed, SEO, and ease of use, with built-in membership, newsletter, and monetization tools. Markdown editing is clean and fast.
What I Like:
Lightweight and fast
Markdown editor is smooth
Membership + newsletter support
Numbers:
Avg. TTFB for blog post: \~45ms
Pro plan email cap: 50k/month
Use Case: Publishing platforms, personal blogs, editorial teams.
7. TinaCMS
TinaCMS brings visual editing to Git-backed static sites. It integrates directly with markdown or MDX content and gives content editors a live-editing UI during development or in production with authentication. It works great with Next.js, Hugo, and similar SSGs.
What I Like:
Real-time content editing in dev
Git-backed by default
Integrates beautifully with MDX
Numbers:
Git content sync + live preview: \~1.5s
Bundle size overhead: \~200kb
Use Case: Next.js/Hugo devs building content sites with Git as source of truth.
Quick Comparison Table
CMS | API Latency | Real-time | Self-hosting | GraphQL | TypeScript | Best For |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strapi | 70ms | No | Yes | Yes | Partial | Mid-sized apps with admin UI |
Sanity | 60ms | Yes | Beta | Yes | Yes | Structured content w/ collab |
Keystone | 80ms | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | CMS + backend logic |
Payload | 75ms | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Code-first, full-stack apps |
DatoCMS | 40-60ms | Partial | No | Yes | Yes | Large-scale Jamstack sites |
Ghost | 45ms | No | Yes | No | No | Simple blogs, newsletters |
TinaCMS | \~1.5s (Git) | Partial | Yes | No | Yes | Git-powered static sites |
Final Thoughts
There’s no one-size-fits-all. My go-to picks lately have been Payload for self-hosted client work, Sanity when I need structured content, and Ghost when I just want to hit publish and chill.
If you’re still torn, pick based on how much control you want:
Want everything in code? → Payload, Keystone
Need live collaboration + structure? → Sanity
Fast build times for static sites? → DatoCMS, TinaCMS
Blogging/publishing? → Ghost
Bonus tip: If you're building a SaaS or something that needs heavy auth/media/custom logic, skip the hosted CMSes and go straight to Payload or Keystone. You'll thank yourself later.
Have questions or want help choosing for your use case? Hit us up.